<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Alex Krulikowski</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alexkrulikowski.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alexkrulikowski.com</link>
	<description>GD&#38;T Educator, Author, and Consultant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 14:57:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Alex quoted about ASME Y14.41-2003 in July 2010 Mechanical Engineering Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.alexkrulikowski.com/2010/08/02/alex-quoted-about-asme-y14-41-2003-in-july-2010-mechanical-engineering-magazine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alexkrulikowski.com/2010/08/02/alex-quoted-about-asme-y14-41-2003-in-july-2010-mechanical-engineering-magazine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 14:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Krulikowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ASME Y14.41-2003]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alex krulikowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[article]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexkrulikowski.com/?p=150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Digital Tolerance," by Associate Editor Jean Thilmany, includes quotes from Alex as an expert on the ASME Y14.41-2003 Standard on Digital Product Definition Data Practices. Alex served as chairman of the Y14.41 Committee and developed a course on Solid Model Tolerancing that is available as an onsite workshop through ETI.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest issue of Mechanical Engineering Magazine  features an article discussing whether or not the advantages of model-based definition justify the effort to change engineering, manufacturing, and inspection practices.</p>
<p><a class="thickbox" href="http://www.etinews.com/blog/wp-content/gallery/effective-training/alex-inme-copy_2.jpg"><img class="ngg-singlepic ngg-none" src="http://www.etinews.com/blog/wp-content/gallery/effective-training/thumbs/thumbs_alex-inme-copy_2.jpg" alt="alex-inme-copy_2" /></a></p>
<p>&#8220;Digital Tolerance,&#8221; by Associate Editor Jean Thilmany, includes quotes from Alex as an expert on the ASME Y14.41-2003 Standard on Digital Product Definition Data Practices.<em> </em>Alex served as chairman of the Y14.41 Committee and developed a course on <a href="http://etinews.com/services_onsite_y1441.html">Solid Model Tolerancing</a> that is available as an onsite workshop through ETI.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Engineers and manufacturers can use the standard to communicate model tolerancing in an accepted way, Krulikowski said. “If one company shows model tolerances one way and another company another way, the user doesn’t know how to find them on the drawing, or how to interpret them and read them,” he said.</p>
<p><a href="http://memagazine.asme.org/Articles/2010/July/Digital_Tolerance.cfm" target="_blank">Read the full article here.</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.etinews.com/services_onsite_quote.php" target="_blank">Request information about a workshop.<br />
</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alexkrulikowski.com/2010/08/02/alex-quoted-about-asme-y14-41-2003-in-july-2010-mechanical-engineering-magazine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Question about a profile tolerance specification (ISO or ASME Y14.5)</title>
		<link>http://www.alexkrulikowski.com/2010/02/18/question-about-a-profile-tolerance-specification-iso-or-asme-y14-5/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alexkrulikowski.com/2010/02/18/question-about-a-profile-tolerance-specification-iso-or-asme-y14-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 21:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Krulikowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexkrulikowski.com/?p=141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question from a reader about a profile tolerance specification and whether it adheres to ISO or ASME Y14.5 standards.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Q &#8211; Can you please explain the meaning of the following tolerance symbol? Which type of standard is this, ASME or ISO?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.etinews.com/blog/wp-content/gallery/effective-training/drawing_figure.jpg"><img class="alignnone" title="Drawing Figure" src="http://www.etinews.com/blog/wp-content/gallery/effective-training/drawing_figure.jpg" alt="" width="280" height="152" /></a></p>
<p>Edward C.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Hi Ed,</p>
<p>The profile tolerance does not adhere to either the current ISO or ASME Y14.5 standards. Neither standard permits the word &#8220;BILATERAL&#8221; in the feature control frame. Also, both standards require that the geometric symbol be placed in the first compartment and the tolerance value in the second compartment, followed by the datum references in the third, fourth, and fifth compartments, if applicable.</p>
<p>Thanks for question,</p>
<p>Alex</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alexkrulikowski.com/2010/02/18/question-about-a-profile-tolerance-specification-iso-or-asme-y14-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Question about a basic dimension without a specific tolerance</title>
		<link>http://www.alexkrulikowski.com/2010/02/02/question-about-a-basic-dimension-without-a-specific-tolerance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alexkrulikowski.com/2010/02/02/question-about-a-basic-dimension-without-a-specific-tolerance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 20:05:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Krulikowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexkrulikowski.com/?p=138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Basic dimensions by nature are a theoretically exact value; however, the feature(s) of a part they define as ideal or exact do need to have tolerances to permit acceptable levels of imperfection during manufacturing.

When a feature is defined with basic dimensions, the tolerance for that feature must be expressed through a geometric tolerance. Most often, the geometric tolerance is indicated directly to the feature or feature of size on the face of the drawing; however, some companies include a general geometrical tolerance (such as a position tolerance or profile of a surface tolerance) in the drawing's general notes. This can be an effective tool when the note is carefully written.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Q &#8211; If a basic dimension does not show a specific tolerance what tolerance should be applied?</p>
<p>Elton Hughes</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;</p>
<p>A &#8211; Basic dimensions by nature are a theoretically exact value; however, the feature(s) of a part they define as ideal or exact do need to have tolerances to permit acceptable levels of imperfection during manufacturing.</p>
<p>When a feature is defined with basic dimensions, the tolerance for that feature must be expressed through a geometric tolerance. Most often, the geometric tolerance is indicated directly to the feature or feature of size on the face of the drawing; however, some companies include a general geometrical tolerance (such as a position tolerance or profile of a surface tolerance) in the drawing&#8217;s general notes. This can be an effective tool when the note is carefully written.</p>
<p>Drawings based on ISO standards frequently use a class of general geometrical tolerances standardized in ISO 2768-2 :1989. The three classes are identified through the use of the upper case letters H, K, or L after the ISO 2768 indication on the drawing. You would need a copy of the standard to interpret the amount of tolerance available.</p>
<p>If you are absolutely certain that a geometrical tolerance has not been applied to the basic dimension (check all drawing views), then the drawing must be considered as incomplete. Without a tolerance, selecting a manufacturing process for the considered feature is impossible to do with any amount of certainty, and there is no acceptance criteria to compare measurements to during the inspection process.</p>
<p>Thanks for writing,</p>
<p>Alex</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alexkrulikowski.com/2010/02/02/question-about-a-basic-dimension-without-a-specific-tolerance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GD&amp;T Training Pyramid explains complete GD&amp;T education</title>
		<link>http://www.alexkrulikowski.com/2009/11/02/gdt-training-pyramid-explains-complete-gdt-education/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alexkrulikowski.com/2009/11/02/gdt-training-pyramid-explains-complete-gdt-education/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Krulikowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexkrulikowski.com/?p=146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The pyramid allows you to see all the training levels, as well as the basic courses - or the foundation - upon which your GD&#038;T education should build. We often find that students attempt to master a higher level course without fully understanding the basics. For example, if you don't completely understand the requirements of engineering drawings, you won't be ready to learn GD&#038;T fundamentals.

The pyramid also incorporates the valuable concept of mentoring employees. Once a workshop is over, mentoring allows employees to utilize their newly attained GD&#038;T knowledge to its full potential on the job. The gray areas in the pyramid signify those areas where I advise that the mentoring be implemented.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://etinews.com/solutions/gdt_training_pyramid.pdf" target="_blank"><img class="ngg-singlepic ngg-center" src="http://www.etinews.com/blog/wp-content/gallery/effective-training/training_pyramid_w_apps-oct2009-900.jpg" alt="training_pyramid_w_apps-oct2009-900" width="630" height="454" /></a></p>
<p>A few years ago, I decided to put together some type of graphic that would organize and illustrate the many levels of <a href="http://www.etinews.com/onsite_training.html" target="_blank">workshops</a> that ETI offers. It needed to include the prerequisites for each course and some way to easily visualize the entire  GD&amp;T training hierarchy. The GD&amp;T Training Pyramid was the result. (Click on the graphic above to access a larger view.)</p>
<p>The pyramid allows you to see all the training levels, as well as the basic courses &#8211; or the foundation &#8211; upon which your GD&amp;T education should build. We often find that students attempt to master a higher level course without fully understanding the basics. For example, if you don&#8217;t completely understand the <a href="http://www.etinews.com/services_onsite_engineering_drawing_requirements.html" target="_blank">requirements of engineering drawings</a>, you won&#8217;t be ready to learn <a href="http://www.etinews.com/services_onsite_fundamentals.html" target="_blank">GD&amp;T fundamentals</a>.</p>
<p>The pyramid also incorporates the valuable concept of mentoring employees. Once a workshop is over, mentoring allows employees to utilize their newly attained GD&amp;T knowledge to its full potential on the job. The gray areas in the pyramid signify those areas where I advise that the mentoring be implemented.</p>
<p>In these tough economic times, companies often cut training budgets first, but allowing ETI to assist them in incorporating a mentoring program into the workplace can often mean valuable dollars are saved through the best use of manpower and materials.</p>
<p>In future blogs, I&#8217;ll go into more detail about each of the pyramid&#8217;s levels. If you&#8217;d like your own copy of the GD&amp;T Training Pyramid, <a href="http://etinews.com/solutions/gdt_training_pyramid.pdf" target="_blank">click here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alexkrulikowski.com/2009/11/02/gdt-training-pyramid-explains-complete-gdt-education/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Question about invoking the Y14.5 Standard</title>
		<link>http://www.alexkrulikowski.com/2009/07/17/question-about-invoking-the-y14-5-standard/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alexkrulikowski.com/2009/07/17/question-about-invoking-the-y14-5-standard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Krulikowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexkrulikowski.com/?p=136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I'm wondering about when you state the ASME Y14.5-2009 Standard on your drawing in a note or in a title block what it actually means.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a question we received last week&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>I have been talking with some drafters and engineers about the standard and have heard varying answers. I&#8217;m wondering about when you state the ASME Y14.5-2009 Standard on your drawing in a note or in a title block what it actually means.</p>
<p>Ex. &#8220;INTERPRET DIMENSIONING AND TOLERANCING PER STANDARD ASME Y14.5-2009&#8243;</p>
<p>Does it mean that the print will always be dimensioned using GD&amp;T?</p>
<p>Does it force you to only dimension using GD&amp;T, or can you use the basic limit dimensioning style?</p>
<p>Does the basic limit dimensioning style still fall under that standard?</p>
<p>Brian Mebruer<br />
Cooper Industries</p></blockquote>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="ngg-singlepic ngg-none" src="http://www.etinews.com/blog/wp-content/gallery/effective-training/2009_question.jpg" alt="Y14.5 Question" /></p>
<p>Great question! People often wonder if invoking the Y14.5 Standard means that they can no longer use limit dimensions (some call it coordinate tolerancing). The Y14.5 Standard does allow the use of limit dimensions. Also, when specifying the Y14.5 Standard, it invokes Rule #1, which helps to clarify where limit dimensions are used as size dimensions.</p>
<p>However, the Y14.5 Standard discourages the use of limit dimensions for locating features of size (i.e. holes, widths, tabs, etc.).</p>
<p>Using limit dimensions for locating features of size has three major shortcomings:</p>
<ol>
<li>The square (or rectangular) tolerance zones are overly restrictive.</li>
<li>The tolerance zones are always a fixed size.</li>
<li>There are no specifications for how to hold the part for measurement.</li>
</ol>
<p>The first two shortcomings result in less tolerance for manufacturing. The third shortcoming of limit dimensioning is that it results in confusion or disputes over inspection results. The lack of datum specifications leaves the drawing with at least several interpretations.</p>
<p>I hope this helps.</p>
<p>Alex</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alexkrulikowski.com/2009/07/17/question-about-invoking-the-y14-5-standard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ISO Geometrical Tolerancing 3-Day Workshop, Sept 29-Oct 1, 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.alexkrulikowski.com/2009/07/02/iso-geometrical-tolerancing-3-day-workshop-sept-29-oct-1-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alexkrulikowski.com/2009/07/02/iso-geometrical-tolerancing-3-day-workshop-sept-29-oct-1-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 15:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Krulikowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GD&T public workshops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GD&T training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GD&T workshops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISO dimensioning and tolerancing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISO standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alex krulikowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engineering drawings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global training]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.etinews.com/blog/?p=608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The ISO Geometrical Tolerancing 3-day workshop will be held September 29th - October 1st, here in the Detroit area. The three-day ISO workshop will help you to understand engineering drawings that use the International Standards Organization (ISO) standards.

The course was written with three goals in mind:
1. To help you recognize what is required on a good (standard-compliant) drawing
2. To help you understand geometrical tolerances based on the ISO standards
3. To combine and explain information from dozens of ISO standards into a logical understandable topic]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this month, I blogged about my new geometric tolerancing book that explains the use of ISO standards on technical drawings:</p>
<address>Alex Krulikowski&#8217;s ISO Geometrical Tolerancing Reference Guide</address>
<p>It&#8217;s a comprehensive book that can be used to learn the topic, and it&#8217;s also a great reference guide. The book is based on ISO 1101-2004 and companion standards.</p>
<p>ETI is offering a course this fall that utilizes the new book. The ISO Geometrical Tolerancing 3-day workshop will be held September 29th &#8211; October 1st, here in the Detroit area. The three-day ISO workshop will help you to understand engineering drawings that use the International Standards Organization (ISO) standards.</p>
<p>The course was written with three goals in mind:<br />
1. To help you recognize what is required on a good (standard-compliant) drawing<br />
2. To help you understand geometrical tolerances based on the ISO standards<br />
3. To combine and explain information from dozens of ISO standards into a logical understandable topic</p>
<p>You’ll learn about &#8230;<img class="ngg-singlepic ngg-right" src="http://www.etinews.com/blog/wp-content/gallery/effective-training/web_iso_cvr_isodwg_0.jpg" alt="ISO sample drawing" /></p>
<ul>
<li>ISO drawing conventions</li>
<li>GPS basics</li>
<li>Limits and fits</li>
<li>The datum system</li>
<li>Form controls</li>
<li>Orientation controls</li>
<li>Location controls</li>
<li>Run-out and profile controls</li>
<li>General tolerances</li>
<li>Workpiece edges</li>
<li>Surface texture</li>
<li>How ISO compares to ASME</li>
</ul>
<p>If your company is interested in global sourcing and learning how to read drawings created in other countries, this workshop is vital to your success. It will teach you the ins and outs of utilizing the ISO standards and will give you a fundamental knowledge of ISO 1101:2004, related standards, and their application on drawings.</p>
<p>Those who attend the workshop will receive:</p>
<ul>
<li>
<address>Alex Krulikowski&#8217;s ISO Geometrical Tolerancing Reference Guide</address>
</li>
<li>An ISO Geometrical Tolerancing Workbook</li>
<li>Class handouts</li>
<li>An official certificate of completion</li>
</ul>
<p>Read more about the course and specific topics <a href="http://www.etinews.com/public_workshops/gdt_workshops_iso-geometrical-tolerancing.html" >here</a>. I hope to see you in the Detroit area for this exciting new workshop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alexkrulikowski.com/2009/07/02/iso-geometrical-tolerancing-3-day-workshop-sept-29-oct-1-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What are the differences between ASME Y14.5-1994 and 2009?</title>
		<link>http://www.alexkrulikowski.com/2009/06/24/what-are-the-differences-between-asme-y14-5-1994-and-2009-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alexkrulikowski.com/2009/06/24/what-are-the-differences-between-asme-y14-5-1994-and-2009-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 20:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Krulikowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ASME Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASME Y14.5-2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GD&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alex krulikowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geometric tolerancing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.etinews.com/blog/?p=487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As one of the people involved in creating this new version of ASME Y14.5, I have developed a one-day "ASME Y14.5-2009 Update Workshop" that will teach you about the pertinent changes to the standard. This workshop covers over sixty significant revisions, additions, and deletions to the standard. I'll explain new features and compare them to the 1994 Standard. As part of the course, you'll receive a set of comprehensive, illustrated charts that highlight itemized changes in the standard.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new ASME standard contains numerous changes that affect the specification and interpretation of tolerancing. Companies deciding whether or not to update to the new standard need to understand what has changed and how these changes will impact their product.</p>
<p>As one of the people involved in creating this new version of ASME Y14.5, I have developed a one-day &#8220;ASME Y14.5-2009 Update Workshop&#8221; that will teach you about the pertinent changes to the standard. This workshop covers over sixty significant revisions, additions, and deletions to the standard. I&#8217;ll explain new features and compare them to the 1994 Standard. As part of the course, you&#8217;ll receive a set of comprehensive, illustrated <a href="http://etinews.com/products/charts/94_09_new_features_reference_chart.html">charts</a> that highlight itemized changes in the standard.</p>
<p><strong><span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;"> </span></strong></p>
<div class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 210px"><strong><a href="http://www.etinews.com/public_workshops/asme-y145-2009-popup.html" ><img class="ngg-singlepic ngg-right" style="border: 1px solid black;" src="http://www.etinews.com/blog/wp-content/gallery/effective-training/asme-y145-2009-drawing-crop.jpg" alt="asme-y145-2009-drawing-crop.jpg" width="200" height="240" /></a></strong><p class="wp-caption-text">This drawing shows a small percentage of the changes in the ASME Y14.5 Standard. Click to see the entire drawing.</p></div>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><span>I&#8217;ll explain</span> the major changes to the standard, including:</p>
<ul>
<li>Over thirty new or revised terms</li>
<li>Sixteen new or revised symbols</li>
<li>Revisions and additions to the fundamental rules</li>
<li>Revisions and additions to the concept of  feature of size</li>
<li>Revisions and new symbols for datum specifications</li>
<li>Revisions to composite  position tolerances</li>
<li>Surface boundaries and axis methods of  interpretation</li>
<li>Revisions and new additions to profile tolerances</li>
</ul>
<p>The ASME Y14.5 1994-2009 Update Course will help you to:</p>
<ul>
<li>Understand changes in the standard</li>
<li>Learn about new symbols and how to apply them to drawings</li>
<li>Determine the impact of the new standard</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>ETI can provide this training at your site, and it is also being offered as a public workshop in Michigan on Monday, September 28, 2009. The regular price of this workshop is $375; the first 20 registrants pay only $175.</strong></p>
<p>Attendees must have a basic understanding of Y14.5-1994 Dimensioning and Tolerancing practices.</p>
<div>Each workshop participant receives:</p>
<ul>
<li> An ASME Y14.5M-2009 Update Workbook, by Alex Krulikowski</li>
<li>&#8220;<a title="Deliberations on Dimensioning and Tolerancing Standards" href="http://www.gdtsource.com/product.php?productid=202&amp;cat=2&amp;page=1" >Deliberations on Dimensioning and Tolerancing Standards</a>,&#8221; my white paper on developing a strategy for drawing standards</li>
<li>Class handouts</li>
<li>An <a title="ASME Y14.5M-1994 - 2009 Comparison Chart set" href="http://www.gdtsource.com/product.php?productid=200" >ASME Y14.5M-1994 &#8211; 2009 Comparison Chart set</a></li>
<li>An official                   certificate of completion</li>
<li>A 30-day pass to ETI&#8217;s <a title="Engineering Drawing Requirements web-based course" href="http://www.gdtsource.com/product.php?productid=197&amp;cat=11&amp;page=1" >Engineering Drawing Requirements web-based course</a> ($49 value)</li>
</ul>
<p>The workshop <a href="http://www.etinews.com/public_workshops/gdt_workshops_registration.php">registration form</a> is available at the ETI website. I hope to see you there!</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alexkrulikowski.com/2009/06/24/what-are-the-differences-between-asme-y14-5-1994-and-2009-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ASME Y14.5-2009 Quick Update Session, 8/13/2009, in Detroit area</title>
		<link>http://www.alexkrulikowski.com/2009/06/12/asme-y14-5-2009-quick-update-session-8132009-in-detroit-area-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alexkrulikowski.com/2009/06/12/asme-y14-5-2009-quick-update-session-8132009-in-detroit-area-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Krulikowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ASME Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASME Y14.5-2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASME Y14.5M-1994]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GD&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GD&T public workshops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GD&T training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GD&T workshops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Training]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alex krulikowski]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.etinews.com/blog/?p=509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["A Quick Look at the ASME Y14.5-2009 Standard" is a short, 3-hour session about the new ASME Y14.5-2009 Standard. This update session will get you started in understanding the depth of the changes and new features, and it includes a discussion about when it makes sense to implement the new standard. The regular price of this workshop is $50, but the first 20 people to purchase my white paper/comparison chart package for $30 can attend for free.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="left"><span class="style88">The new ASME standard contains numerous changes that affect the specification and interpretation of tolerancing. </span><span class="style88">As one of the participants in the creation of the new standard, I will provide insights as to why the changes were made at a lecture o</span>n August 13th, from 9 am-12 noon, here in Michigan.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.etinews.com/public_workshops/gdt_workshops_asme-y14.5-2009_seminar.html" ><strong><span class="style84"><span style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;">&#8220;A Quick Look at the ASME Y14.5-2009 Standard&#8221;</span></span></strong></a> is a short, 3-hour session about the new ASME Y14.5-2009 Standard. <span class="style88">This update session will get you started in understanding the depth of the changes and new features, and it includes a discussion about when it makes sense to implement the new standard. Topics covered include:</span></p>
<ul>
<li>The ASME  standards development process</li>
<li>Introduction  to new and revised terms</li>
<li>Introduction  to new and revised symbols</li>
<li>Synopsis of  major changes and why they were made</li>
<li>Discussion  on implementing the new standard</li>
<li>Questions/answer session</li>
</ul>
<p class="style89" style="text-align: left;"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-519" title="2009chart_whitepaper_th1" src="http://www.etinews.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/2009chart_whitepaper_th1.jpg" alt="2009chart_whitepaper_th1" width="99" height="150" />The regular price of this workshop is $50, but the first 20 people to <a href="http://www.gdtsource.com/product.php?productid=203" >purchase my white paper/comparison chart package</a> for $30 can attend for free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alexkrulikowski.com/2009/06/12/asme-y14-5-2009-quick-update-session-8132009-in-detroit-area-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ASME Y14.5-2009 white paper: “Deliberations on Dimensioning and Tolerancing Standards”</title>
		<link>http://www.alexkrulikowski.com/2009/06/08/asme-y14-5-2009-white-paper-%e2%80%9cdeliberations-on-dimensioning-and-tolerancing-standards%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alexkrulikowski.com/2009/06/08/asme-y14-5-2009-white-paper-%e2%80%9cdeliberations-on-dimensioning-and-tolerancing-standards%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 18:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Krulikowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ASME Standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASME Y14.5-2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASME Y14.5M-1994]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GD&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GD&T products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISO dimensioning and tolerancing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISO standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alex krulikowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[article]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geometric tolerancing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[global training]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.etinews.com/blog/?p=480</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Deliberations on Dimensioning and Tolerancing Standards" is a 12-page paper that includes a summary of the major changes to the ASME Y14.5 standard and insight into what other companies are planning. It also includes my deliberations and recommendations on changing dimensioning standards.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal;"><a href="http://www.gdtsource.com/product.php?productid=202" ><img class="size-full wp-image-484 alignright" style="margin-left: 5px; margin-right: 5px;" title="whitepaper-asmesurvey_150" src="http://www.etinews.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/whitepaper-asmesurvey_150.jpg" alt="whitepaper-asmesurvey_150" width="116" height="150" /></a>A few months ago, I created a survey asking whether companies plan to adopt the new Y14.5-2009 standard, stay with the 1994 standard, or change to ISO standards. Using statistics elicited from the survey responses, I have developed a white paper addressing these issues.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal;"><strong><a href="http://www.gdtsource.com/product.php?productid=202" >&#8220;Deliberations on Dimensioning and Tolerancing Standards&#8221;</a> </strong>is a 12-page paper that will help organizations decide what path may be the best for them. It includes a summary of the major changes to the ASME Y14.5 standard and insight into what other companies are planning. It also includes my deliberations and recommendations on changing dimensioning standards.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: normal;">It&#8217;s <a href="http://www.gdtsource.com/product.php?productid=202" >available for $25 on our website</a>.</p>
<p class="style1"><strong></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alexkrulikowski.com/2009/06/08/asme-y14-5-2009-white-paper-%e2%80%9cdeliberations-on-dimensioning-and-tolerancing-standards%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New ISO geometrical tolerancing: expert proofreaders needed</title>
		<link>http://www.alexkrulikowski.com/2009/06/01/new-iso-geometrical-tolerancing-expert-proofreaders-needed-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alexkrulikowski.com/2009/06/01/new-iso-geometrical-tolerancing-expert-proofreaders-needed-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 18:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alex Krulikowski</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GD&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISO 1101-2004]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISO GPS standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISO dimensioning and tolerancing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISO standards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alex krulikowski]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engineering drawings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.etinews.com/blog/?p=467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am working on a new geometric tolerancing book that explains the use of ISO standards on technical drawings. If you are experienced in ISO GPS standards and would like to be part of the proofreading team, send me an email describing your expertise level, and I’ll add your name to the list of prospective technical experts for proofreading.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="ngg-singlepic ngg-left" src="http://www.etinews.com/blog/wp-content/gallery/effective-training/web_isogt_rg.jpg" alt="web_isogt_rg.jpg" /></p>
<p>I am working on a new geometric tolerancing book that explains the use of ISO standards on technical drawings. This comprehensive book can be used for multiple purposes: the topics are organized in a format conducive to learning the topic, plus it contains many features that make it a great reference guide. The book is based on ISO 1101-2004 and companion standards.</p>
<p>This is an exciting project, and I’m anxious to complete the final draft. The book is very close to the expert review stage. The process of having a team of technical experts proofread a new book is an important part of writing a technically sound book. I have learned from previous projects that it always results in a better product.</p>
<p>I have most of the proofreading team in place, but I would like to have three or four additional technical experts who are experienced in ISO GPS. Proofreading requires a commitment of your time. I am estimating the draft will be ready for review by mid to late June, and the technical review must be completed by about 30 days after that.</p>
<p>There is no pay for proofreading, but there are rewards. First, you will enjoy reading and dissecting each section of the book. You may even find some new information on some aspect of the ISO standards. Also, your name will be listed in the credits, and you will receive a free copy of the book when it is published.</p>
<p>If you are experienced in ISO GPS standards and would like to be part of the proofreading team, <a href="mailto:alexk@etinews.com?subject=ISO%20book%20proofreader" >send me an email</a> describing your expertise level, and I’ll add your name to the list of prospective technical experts for proofreading.</p>
<p>Sincere thanks,</p>
<p>Alex</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alexkrulikowski.com/2009/06/01/new-iso-geometrical-tolerancing-expert-proofreaders-needed-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
